🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," stated one MEP supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of the West, further countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments around the world are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.